Sunday, June 28, 2015

Cat of Many Tails, Ellery Queen, Reviewed by Anthony Boucher


By Anthony Boucher, New York Times, October 9, 1949.

“A detective novel," wrote S.S. Van Dine in 1928 should contain no long descriptive passages, no literary dallying with side-issues, no subtly worked-out character analyses, no ‘atmospheric. preoccupations.’ And Ellery Queen, making his debut the following year, loyally obeyed Van Dine’s dictum, But the detective novel, thank heaven, has in the past twenty years grown far away from the sterile smugness of Van Dine and Ellery Queen has grown up with it.

“Queen has not followed the trends of the times so closely as to succumb to the amorphous plotlessness of the current "suspense novel"; "Cat of Many Tails" presents the puzzle-minded reader with a very pretty problem indeed. And it includes a brand-new solution to one of the fine classic gambits, the hidden motive underlying an apparently unrelated series of murders. It then goes on to probe the psychology behind the puzzle, with Ellery as an odd sort of lay deductive analyst.

“But what you will most remember the novel for is its ‘descriptive passages’ and ‘atmospheric’ preoccupations. If the human characters still betray a touch of the bloodlessness of the Van Dine era, the actual protagonist of the novel, the City of New York, comes magnificently to life. The impact of mass murder on the soul of a city has never, that I can recall, been depicted with such convincing vividness. Even the benighted few who have hitherto deplored the artificiality of the Queen saga will find a new scope and stature in ‘Cat of Many Tails.’”

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

The Case of the Half-Wakened Wife, Erle Stanley Gardner


The second Perry Mason book published in 1945, The Case of the Half-Wakened Wife marks the 27th appearance of Mason, Della Street, and the crew.

By this point in the series, Erle Stanley Gardner had been dictating his books for years and while they make for entertaining reading they certainly don't stand up to close scrutiny. For example, early in the book Gardner introduces a character who, get this, actually studies law books looking for precedents. Gardner seems to forget all about this character even though he could have been brought in to help wrap the case up. 

Fun to read but eminently forgettable. 

Two-and-one-half pistols out of four.